<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:bankofengland.blog.co.uk,2009-11-22:/</id><title>Bank of England</title><link rel="self" href="http://bankofengland.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bankofengland.blog.co.uk/"/><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-22T06:39:50+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:bankofengland.blog.co.uk,2009-08-04:/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c10584186</id><title>In response to:Usury Act of 1571</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bankofengland.blog.co.uk/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c10584186"/><author><name>Prestito</name></author><published>2009-08-04T06:25:37+02:00</published><updated>2009-08-04T06:25:37+02:00</updated><content type="html">Hi, despite the global dominance of the western finance values of usury alternative methods, such as sharia-complaint products, are gaining in popularity.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.prestiti-online.org/"&gt;Prestito&lt;/a&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bankofengland.blog.co.uk,2009-06-24:/2009/03/28/a-cabal-of-dutch-bankers-5848623/#c10250862</id><title>In response to:A Cabal of Dutch Bankers</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bankofengland.blog.co.uk/2009/03/28/a-cabal-of-dutch-bankers-5848623/#c10250862"/><author><name>williamshepherd</name></author><published>2009-06-24T18:12:48+02:00</published><updated>2009-06-24T18:12:48+02:00</updated><content type="html">But it doesn't have to be like this. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Bankers should be professional public servants - a department of the Institute of Chartered Accountants.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
See a short piece on my William Franklin blog on Mints and Exchanges at http://williamfranklin.blog.co.uk/2009/06/23/mints-and-exchanges-6372571/</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bankofengland.blog.co.uk,2009-06-24:/2009/03/28/a-cabal-of-dutch-bankers-5848623/#c10250676</id><title>In response to:A Cabal of Dutch Bankers</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bankofengland.blog.co.uk/2009/03/28/a-cabal-of-dutch-bankers-5848623/#c10250676"/><author><name>lol</name></author><published>2009-06-24T17:50:47+02:00</published><updated>2009-06-24T17:50:47+02:00</updated><content type="html">what a mess&lt;br&gt;
</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bankofengland.blog.co.uk,2009-06-15:/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c10165897</id><title>In response to:Usury Act of 1571</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bankofengland.blog.co.uk/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c10165897"/><author><name>williamshepherd</name></author><published>2009-06-15T09:00:47+02:00</published><updated>2009-06-15T09:00:47+02:00</updated><content type="html">This post started life as a footnote to an essay entitled Usury Free Banking which is now available online at &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/lepyot"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/lepyot&lt;/a&gt; . The essay discusses Grameen banking in the context of interest-free vs. usury-free banking. </content></entry><entry><id>tag:bankofengland.blog.co.uk,2009-06-15:/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c10165196</id><title>In response to:Usury Act of 1571</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bankofengland.blog.co.uk/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c10165196"/><author><name>Mutuo</name></author><published>2009-06-15T06:53:16+02:00</published><updated>2009-06-15T06:53:16+02:00</updated><content type="html">The Grameen Home Loan Programme should be the model for the first Public Credit issue in the UK. Instead of turning building societies into unsuccessful bankers which was the effect of the act of vandalisation by the Thatcher Government, they should have been confederated into a Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae at the county level and outsourced to Grameen for the introduction of Grameen principles for one-home owners in the UK.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.mutuo-prestito.org/"&gt;Mutuo&lt;/a&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bankofengland.blog.co.uk,2009-06-09:/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c10116078</id><title>In response to:Usury Act of 1571</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bankofengland.blog.co.uk/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c10116078"/><author><name>Prestito</name></author><published>2009-06-09T10:59:49+02:00</published><updated>2009-06-09T10:59:49+02:00</updated><content type="html">You HEARD THEM.They didn't  the money in the first place NO MORE BSILOUTS!&lt;a href="http://www.prestiti-online.org"&gt;Prestito&lt;/a&gt; what i don't understand is how could obama and his experts not have know that there was no cristis and the banks were fine? was it all crying wolf was this all a joke?&lt;br&gt;
</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bankofengland.blog.co.uk,2009-04-22:/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c9720919</id><title>In response to:Usury Act of 1571</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bankofengland.blog.co.uk/2009/04/22/usury-act-of-5989588/#c9720919"/><author><name>Sabine K McNeill</name></author><published>2009-04-22T21:09:22+02:00</published><updated>2009-04-22T21:09:22+02:00</updated><content type="html">Well, dear William Shepherd, &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Class A means: the penalty imposed on the usurer is THREE TIMES the amount stolen! &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And in the Bank of England Act 1694, the penalty is THREE TIMES the abusive trading. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
May our Early Day Motion 1297 "Enforcement of Bank of England Act 1694" be enforced! &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
See: http://tinyurl.com/dyt3d8  </content></entry></feed>
